Is it possible to make an image of a neutrino...?

[zozman]

Have you try the right tp parameters? Because 12712 with SR 43702 is wrong -> https://www.lyngsat.com/muxes/SES-9_Sou ... 711-V.html
It should be 12711V and SR 43700 - 3/4 and QPSK was OK.

[DM900]

Have you try the right tp parameters? Because 12712 with SR 43702 is wrong -> https://www.lyngsat.com/muxes/SES-9_Sou ... 711-V.html
It should be 12711V and SR 43700 - 3/4 and QPSK was OK.

No I replaced satellite.xml file
I will try Manually

I got signal of this tp but I need to put one tuner unused and other independent after that it works it is strange

screenshot (3).png

[zozman]

I think your configuration is wrong. You should describe your Sat config (not only "diseqc XYZ") and lines.

If you use 2 independent cables (2 different lines or unicable), then both to Independent (but not with FBC tuner). If you use 1 line splittet (no unicable), then Master/Loop.

[DM900]

I think your configuration is wrong. You should describe your Sat config (not only "diseqc XYZ") and lines.

If you use 2 independent cables (2 different lines or unicable), then both to Independent (but not with FBC tuner). If you use 1 line splittet (no unicable), then Master/Loop.

My Sat config is Tuner A1 5 satellites with diseqc switch 1.1 with independent line
And tuner A2 with 3 satellites with diseqc 1.0 independent line
There is no problem to use diseqc switch in this image but working only if I set any tuner unused other independent

[zozman]

Indeed very strange. I have only unicable and no problems with Independent/Independent for both connections so I don't know what the problem is on your configuration.

EDIT: Idea, timing changed.

[DM900]

Indeed very strange. I have only unicable and no problems with Independent/Independent for both connections so I don't know what the problem is on your configuration.

EDIT: Idea, timing changed.

I replaced this in use/bin still same
One tuner working fully but need to select other tuner unused

[DM900]

OK, thanks for testing. Was currently the last idea by me...

[DM900]

OK, thanks for testing. Was currently the last idea by me...

Ok thanks for your support

[DM900]

Does your dm900 is clone or original I think I have clone that is actually reason this image not working correctly here in my box

[DM900]

I have a original DM900, no clone. Are you sure you have a clone? Here some pictures -> https://board.newnigma2.to/wbb4/index.p ... C3%B6st-C/

What is not working or which problems do you have?

[DM900]

I have a original DM900, no clone. Are you sure you have a clone? Here some pictures -> https://board.newnigma2.to/wbb4/index.p ... C3%B6st-C/

What is not working or which problems do you have?

Yes my dm900 box is clone because it has security sim not security ic
Problems are already discussed with u
Even every original image of dmm or opensource working good only problem is in this image

[DM900]

Hi does Neutrino support chkroot Multiboot

[zozman]

BA (chroot) may not supported - not testet.

[DM900]

BA (chroot) may not supported - not testet.

It works in Ba but chkroot not supported i tested

[zozman]

Hmm, chroot comes from BA itself and also included at Busybox. At sh4 there was not really changes needed for BA. You should see with serial log what is wrong. The main problem with the old "BA method" (chroot) is, only one kernel for all images used. And a image update will not work (or destroy all images), because not a real single partition for one image is used. A mini-UBoot (2nd bootloader) would be a better way for a real multiboot, because a manual start from the original bootloader itself is no problem with real partitions. I have try'd something with a 2nd UBoot but I think my config is wrong.